Thursday, August 09, 2007

Self-Presentation III: The Conclusion


I'm sure you're all aching to know how my submission to the Yale Review went and how the Open Mike went. :)

So here's a wrap-up of my past two posts on self-presentation. I got a rejection from the Yale Review very quickly; on my July 27th post I claim to have mailed the submission the previous day, so it must have been July 26th that I sent it off, and I got the rejection August 8th. 13 days. Well, at least they made a decision quickly so that I could move on instead of waiting and agonizing.

Still, as used as I am to getting form-letter rejections (which I think are perfectly OK) I was really surprised at the curtness of this one. They don't even use an 8.5 x 11 sheet of paper with a 2-line message--which I have come to accept as common protocol, acceptable. What they have instead, friends, is a business card. A business card that states: "We want to thank you for your kindness in letting us see your work, and regret that we must use this form to let you know that we have not found a place for it in..." what comes next is a line break, followed by the publication's EXTRA LARGE logo as the last thing they leave you with. As used as I am to rejections, I must admit that this has set a record, a new expectation, for editorial curtness and cheekiness (a perfect match, admittedly, for my curt and cheeky cover letter).

But on to the good news!!! You do want to know how last Thursday's Open Mike went, right? So okay. What I attended was the August installment of a year-long series in which 2 featured poets read on the first Thursday of each month. That evening's featured poets, Linda Fischer and B.E. Kahn, each read for half an hour, and then there was a 10-minute break, followed by the Open Mike, at which each audience member got to read one poem (and there were about 20 performers). I went with the crowd-pleaser, by the way--and the crowd's reaction was great. In fact, on my way out, the series host asked if I would like to be part of the series!!! (And it's a series that contains 2 of the well known Philadelphia poets I interviewed for my summer dissertation!)

This is a big deal for me--although in retrospect, years from now, it probably won't be--because it's the first reading that I've had that isn't a class reading, college lit mag reading, or Open Mike. Not a reading by "the Short Fiction II class," or "the 2005-06 contributors to Bryn Mawr's literary magazine," but a 30-minute Anna reading! I've never been offered that much floor time in my life! I'm going to buy me a dress to celebrate. Any suggestions for an appropriate outfit... not too flashy, but not too casual? ;)

9 comments:

Writer, Rejected said...

Hey, congrats on the rejection letter. It may smart, but think of it as a rite of passage. Check out more at www.literaryrejectionsondisplay.blogpost.com for more on the topic. Maybe you'll want to air your rejection in a public (anonymous) posting. It'll make you feel great.

L. said...

Hey, very nicely done. Buy something the color of Homer's wine-dark sea. It's very in this season. Accesorize with something ochre and with Italian-style sunglasses. You're bound to slay.

And as for the rejection letter, I'm jealous. The Barcelona Review can't be bothered to respond even to my follow-up message, five months post-submission, asking whether I'll ever hear from them.

Noah said...

very awesome, anna! hope your long reading is a great experience!

i've received a good half-dozen "business card" rejections. seems the "big guys" use them... they probably get so many submissions that they feel guilty using so much paper. it feels slight, but whatever. i've been waiting on a few journals for over a year (even after a follow-up query).

i got a handwritten comment on one once... i forget who, but there was only enough room for a couple word sentence. something like, "thanks, submit again! -Eds."

Rambler said...

Congrads, Anna. An occasion as wonderful as this definitely merits accessories. Buy yourself a nice purse or handbag to match the dress. Something that every time you use it afterwards reminds you of your success and risk-taking that paid off.

Miles Newbold Clark said...

Don't worry about the size of the card, Anna. The Paris Review uses (or did use) something similar, and their their rejection isn't a card, but a piece of paper. I have gotten two types of cards from them. As far as I can remember, they go like this:

First:

"Thank you for submitting your work to the Paris Review. We regret that we can not make use of it at this time."

Second:

"Thank you for showing your manuscript to The Paris Review. We are interested in your work and would like to see more of it."

Most large magazines hesitate to comment specifically on work, because if they do the next thing that will happen is the would-be contributor will send them thirty stories. Getting anything more than "thanks, submit again" is almost impossible at any larger publication.

Anna said...

Considering that I am a broke college student, I'll probably just get a Milkboy t-shirt (name fot the cafe where the series takes place; though for the first half of the year it took place at Barnes & Noble, which is now closed at Bryn Mawr, to the disappointment of students and profs). But thanks for the dress/accessory advice, friends--it's really sweet. :)

Conor said...

you ever think of starting a rejection query spreadsheet? I'm doing it with some folks at my school and it's working pretty well. We all have about twenty or so magazines we're researching, finding out the best way to send, and times to expect rejection responses so we can better navigate the ropes. ANyway, good luck. I've been rejected over 550 times now. Most of them are in a file behind me. Some are in book form under my feet.

Shopping Blog said...

Before finding out about links of london uk watches you should be familiar with some of the terminology. cheap links of london The word horology has two meanings; it is the study or science of measuring time links london jewellery or the art of making clocks, watches, and devices for telling links of london sale time.Since the first appearance of man on the earth an effort has links of london silver been made to determine time.The tracking of the sun's movement across discount links of london the sky, candles that were marked at intervals.Water clocks did links of london bracelet not depend on the observation of the sky or the sun.

每当遇见你 said...

Here’s a list of tools you will need to start: Jewelers’ pandora jewellery wire cutters - If you can only afford one pair, get memory wire shears. pandora charms These are designed to make clean cuts on tough memory wire, so can also be used for pandora charms uk softer wires. Chain-nose pliers sometimes called cheap pandora charms needle-nose pliers – Very versatile for picking up and grasping small items, pandora charms sale bending eye pins, closing jumps rings, even closing crimp beads. discount pandora charms Round-nose pliers – Used for creating loops on beaded head and eye pins. Can also be used for winding your own jump rings and as the second pliers you’cheap pandora ll need for closing jump rings. Optional pliers – Wire-looping pliers which have several graduated circumferences to allow you to form perfectly uniform jump rings and loops in place of the pandora discount uk round-nose pliers mentioned above. Crimping pliers which have little notches to allow you to both flatten a crimp bead and then bend it to form a rounded finished look instead of the flat crimp you pandora uk get using the chain-nose pliers. As for materials, I recommend some assortment packs of beads in coordinating colors, some decorative metal spacers, seed beads in both silver and gold These can serve as spacers and beautifully set off pandora sale your other beads., tube-shaped crimp beads Buy the best you can find – these are what hold it all together!, head and eye pins. Other than that, let your choice of project be your guide. You might want some silver or pewter charms.